Food campaign news
Shop Goldman Sachs to the regulator
Thank you for calling the Financial Services Authority (FSA) during our week of action (19th - 23rd July) and asking them to rein in the irresponsible food gambling by Goldman Sachs and other banks like them.
Please note that this action is over but please feel free to read the comments left by callers to the FSA. If you want to do more, please write to your MP to express your concerns over food speculation.
***********
Food speculation is one of the ways bankers’ greed harms the poor and puts us all at risk, and the huge investment bank Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest culprits.
Our financial regulator, the Financial Services Authority or FSA, is charged with keeping the financial system stable and safe. We should look to them to rein in the irresponsible food gambling of Goldman Sachs and banks like them.
We want the government to give the regulator the powers it needs to stop this. For one week, starting Monday 19 July, we need the phones ringing off the hook at the FSA, demanding action against Goldman Sachs.
Call the FSA now
Please help us by phoning the FSA, asking it to demand powers to stop bankers betting on food.
The phone number to call is 0845 606 1234
Once you have called the FSA, please contact your MP asking him/her to support regulation of food speculation. You can access a template letter here.
What to say
Introduce yourself and say that you are worried that food speculation by banks like Goldman Sachs is driving up world food prices and causing hunger.
[If they ask you for your contact details: You don’t have to do this but you can]
Then tell them that you want the FSA to regulate food speculation to stop banks like Goldman Sachs causing hunger
[They may tell you they don’t have the regulatory power to do this]
Ask them if the FSA will demand that the government give them the power to regulate food speculation.
Thank them for their time, hang up and fill in the form below to tell us what the FSA said to you.
We've put together lots of information about food speculation that can help you.
Please tell us what the FSA said
How to make the phone call
The number to call
0845 606 1234
Calling tips
- Be polite, respectful and clear
- Be prepared to repeat your message to anyone that they may transfer you to, the more regulators that hear your message the better.
- If they ask for proof, mention the World Development Movement publication The Great Hunger Lottery.
- Don't be discouraged if the FSA don't seem like they are listening or try to catch you out with complex questions and policies. As long as you have put your points across then you have done your job!
- If the FSA say they can't deal this or ask you if you are making a complaint, say to them that you are just a member of the public expressing your concern about this issue.
- Please let us know how you get on by leaving a comment at the bottom of this page.





I wrote to Andrew Robathan MP
I wrote to Andrew Robathan MP my local MP (south Leicestershire) using the template provided by WDM with some additional comments from myself. In the past I have had positive responses from Andrew but on this occasion he replied by saying "I think it would be of more use were you to write to the Chancellor yourself. I am afraid he would just see this from me as special pleasding, so migh I suggest you write to him at HM Treasury...". I am not sure what to make of this - perhaps now he is in government he will be more cautious in his responses - but I will be writing direct to the Chancellor as he suggests.
Posted by Maggie Pankhurst (not verified) on 29 Jul 2010 at about 22:12.Sam, the person to whom I
Sam, the person to whom I talked, explained the issues politely. I told him that I wanted to add my voice to the concerns about speculation in food raising prices. He explained that the issue was not the responsibility of the FSA, and he said that he would log the concern. He suggested that I contact my MP about the issue. I intend to do that. Thanks for your work.
Posted by Bill Glassmire (not verified) on 22 Jul 2010 at about 17:03.I rang on 22nd July and spoke
I rang on 22nd July and spoke to Andrea, who was sympathetic and listened to my points. She agreed that there has been a lot of concern over the issue but said the FSA can't demand the Government give them powers to regulate food speculation. I said I would take it up with my MP which she agreed would be the way forward.
Posted by Angela (not verified) on 22 Jul 2010 at about 15:21.Spoke to Sam today Thursday
Spoke to Sam today Thursday 22nd July. They have had a "fair few" calls. I suggested that the FSA could be pro-active on this issue and earn some brownie points. He said it was up to the government to regulate in this area. Their role in these markets would be restricted to looking at the advice that was being given. "No one can set prices for these markets" he said, claiming that these guys are "physically purchasing" cocoa ot whastever. I said OK then if not you, then who, and pointed out that the USA in the 30's DID regulate on these markets directly. He said that following the pressure things might get changed, and maybe to contact my MP and if a lot of MP's around the country get contacted then maybe there would be questions asked in the Commons.
Posted by Daniel (not verified) on 22 Jul 2010 at about 14:19.Spoke to FSA today at 14.00 I
Spoke to FSA today at 14.00 I was asked to wait while the lady brought up a response that was obviously on a screen. I asked for an email of the blurb, which I was told was not possible. (I should of asked for a letter) I was told my call would be logged.
Posted by mandy (not verified) on 22 Jul 2010 at about 14:09.Just rang the FSA. Kept it
Just rang the FSA. Kept it short as I'm on holiday so on mobile phone, but got polite response promising to log my concern.
Posted by Heather Grinter (not verified) on 22 Jul 2010 at about 12:19.I spoke to a young woman at
I spoke to a young woman at FSA and asked what if anything they would be doing to encourage the UK Government to regulate against speculation in food, citing the impact on prices and the fact that the EU and US govts were considering action. She insisted that FSA could only apply Regulations when in existence. I suggested that they must also have an advisory role. She suggested that the proper course of action was to lobby my MP. I have taken her advice and written to Norman Baker MP.
Posted by David Marshall (not verified) on 22 Jul 2010 at about 11:44.I tried and failed to make
I tried and failed to make contact with the FSA by phone at 17:54 today. Since, by this stage, the point of the call is to add to the tally of complaints about Goldman Sachs and their disastrous food speculation, I sent the message instead by email. Given the reports of FSA's standard disclaimer, about not being the most appropriate body to hear such complaints, I asked if they could tell me where I ought to direct them.
Posted by Aidan Baker (not verified) on 21 Jul 2010 at about 18:10.I spoke to a young woman in
I spoke to a young woman in the FSA. She sounded as if she was reading from a brief which by now, Wednesday, had been prepared to answer calls like mine. She said that the FSA can intervene only if banks behave inappropriately. I asked if it would be inappropriate to bet on the price of food in a way which pushed it up for the poorest countries and quoted the Ethiopia 2006 to 2008 figures. She agreed it would be but said they could act only in accordance with regulations. I asked if they would discuss the problem with Ministers and ask for regulation. She said they were going to speak to Ministers about the calls. Robert Harvey Welwyn Hatfield WDM
Posted by Robert Harvey (not verified) on 21 Jul 2010 at about 15:04.I had a very friendly chat
I had a very friendly chat with David who changed gave me to understand that they had had more than a few calls on this topic. Going so late in the action, I was able to refer to to the media coverage. Qhen asked about where I'd got the number I said wdm website but then moved on to discuss the appropriacy of the FSA being a regulatory body which was looking at this aspect of Banks etc. activities. He repeatedly (politely) told me that they were governed by Parliamentary statute and I said I would write to my MP, but suggested that even if they felt they couldn't tout for custom it would be a good idea for them to put their head around dealing with such responsibilities.
Posted by Stephen Pennells (not verified) on 21 Jul 2010 at about 13:50.Write to your MP
Thank you very much to all of you who have phoned the FSA. If you have a few more minutes to spare, why not also write to your MP? You can find details on what to say and how to do it here: http://www.wdm.org.uk/stop-bankers-betting-food-and-causing-hunger/ask-your-mp-support-regulation-food-speculation
Posted by Admin on 21 Jul 2010 at about 13:17.FSA still being very friendly and patient
I spoke to the very nice Lindsey who said they'd had "a few calls" about this. They said that they couldn't do anything about it, but I explained that I thought they should be able to, and that if the FSA is being replaced or having its remit changed, then the new/revised body should be able to regulate food commodity speculation. She said that every call is looked into, so I felt that my job was done!
Posted by Christine (not verified) on 21 Jul 2010 at about 11:30.called the fsa, now going to write to my MP
Neil and I from the FSA just had a lovely chat. the FSA do regulate the banks to ensure financial stability, and he was saying that they do regulate speculation on currencies but not on commodities. And suggested we all lobby our MPs which is what i am going to do now using the template letter thing above but i think you could email your MP too..
Posted by Kate (not verified) on 21 Jul 2010 at about 11:13.Calling about speculation
Have rung FSA this am. Was dealt with v. courteously, told they'd had lots of calls on the subject and were telling Head Office of this - people felt 'passionately' about this . Suggested got in touch with MP about the powers of FSA since at present don't have neccessary powers to deal with this. V. impressed with media coverage on campaign so far!
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on 21 Jul 2010 at about 10:17.FSA call
I've just phoned the FSA and had a brief conversation with a pleasant -voiced young lady. She asked for all my correspondence details before opening the talk, which I gave her.I expressed forcibly and courteously my concerns over the financial speculations of such banks such as Goldman Sachs,which makes billions of pounds for them while ignoring the fact that thousands of the poorest people in the developing world suffer starvation through the wild fluctuation in the prices of basic commodities.I asked the young lady if the FSA could stop the banks doing such operations. She said the it was not the remit to control the banks.She said that the FSA had to work to strict guidlines.,Only the government could tell the banks what to do.I asked if the FSA would please put this request to the government. She replied it could not. She suggested I should lobby my local MP on this issue.She also gave me a detailed account of the duties of the FSA.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on 21 Jul 2010 at about 10:16.What the FSA said to me when I rang this morning 20.7.10
I rang & having pressed the number for any other matter I got through to David who was very pleasant. I gave him my details & he explained that they would carefully log my call & pass my comments on to the management. He also explained that they did not have the powers to investigate banks in the way I wanted & it would be best to lobby my MP to get the law changed so they could investigate such matters. I will do this. Ian
Posted by Ian Salmon (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 22:04.Phone call to FSA
The woman I spoke to also said that they had received lots of calls in the last few days regarding this topic, but reiterated that it is not within their remit to regulate commodity speculation. As with everyone else it seems, she said that any change in the scope of their powers would have to come through an act of parliament and she suggested writing to my MP. I wonder if there is any value in continuing this action for the rest of the week if they clearly cannot do anything as things currently stand? Perhaps there is some mileage in it in terms of media coverage, but might there also be a risk of it backfiring? Would it be better to change the target of the action?
Posted by Jo Newbery (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 17:18.Food speculation
I phoned the FSA on the number given. My comments were graciously listened to by a member of staff who admitted to having heard from a number of people on this topic. She said that the FSA do not have the power to regulate in this way and that they respond to government rather than advise government on such matters - so they would not see it as their duty to press government in this way. It was suggested that I approach my MP on this matter which I will hope to do. Stan C.
Posted by Stan Crees (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 14:49.Speculation in food prices
I spoke to a jack ?Donachie, (from Estonia); a lot of calls had been received about this and he had in fact been discussing this with his mother yesterday evening. Stated that the FSA had to have authority from the government to be able to act in any way and suggested that I write to my MP. Good, convincing answer from some one who sounded as if he agreed with us. The points from the numerous calls had been passed on to the directors.
Posted by Briony Falch (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 12:36.Food speculation
Very courteous response mostly read to me. Said they hadn't responsibility for pricing but thaat the FSA were "looking into" these issues.
Posted by Elizabeth Jones (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 12:24.Phoned FSA
I phoned FSA at about 16:00 on Monday and spoke to a young woman. I said I was following up a letter on commodity speculation which I wrote to Lord Turner in March. I said I recognised that the FSA was being wound up, a foolish, ideological action in my judgement, but wanted to know what they were doing about speculation. She said it was something they didn't know about but a group was looking at it. I asked if she had any inkling about when their powers were to be transferred but she had no idea. I then aksed if she could advise whther I should write to Osborne or Vince Cable since there appeared to be a regulatory vacuum. She said she didn't know either of them!! At which point I decided there was nothing more to be gleaned from this source.
Posted by John Skutsch (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 11:41.What the FSA said to me
Called just now, the lady who answered was poltite, took my contacts details, and listended carefully, but obviously has script to to stick to for these calls. She didn't go as far as saying she agreed with the campaign goals, but her tone of voice and 'between the lines' message she certainly seemed sympathetic to the movement. She advised (as most seem to have heard) they are not in potiion to act unless changes are made via parliment. Time to write some letters and contact some mp's
Posted by Paul (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 11:38.Great Food Lottery call to FSA
A lady called Shireen/Cherie thanked me for my call and asked for my details. I gave my name and address but not our tel or email and then she then listened to my concerns about food speculation. She completely agreed that it was wrong and symathised with my concerns but made it clear that the FSA was not responsible for regulating the food markets. It was not their job. She said they had had a lot of calls on this topic. I replied that I was asking FSA to request the government to give them this power to stop speculation in food causing wild fluctuations and rises in the prices of basic food stuffs. She repeated the FSA was not a pricing regulator but they were looking into this closely. We politely thanked each other and said goodbye.
Posted by Sue Woodsford (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 11:21.FSA call
I called yesterday, but the WDM site crashed when I tried to leave a comment! I'm quite surprised reading through the comments, that responses seem to have varied quite a bit. The woman I spoke to gave the impression of being sympathetic - she kept telling me she could see where I was coming from and had looked at the WDM website. She asked quite a few questions, which were useful hooks to push the argument. She assured me that FSA head office were on the case and would issue some sort of statement.
Posted by Nicola (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 10:51.Call to FSA re food speculation
Like everyone else, I got a polite response, was read the briefing staff have received from FSA Head Office on what they can and can't do, and advised to write to my MP. I was told all such calls (of which they have had a good few) are logged, and will be reviewed by Head Office to see if there is further action they can take. Now to contact my M.P. - and maybe Goldman Sachs themselves.
Posted by Phillida Sawbridge (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 10:08.Goldman Sachs and Food Speculation
I spoke to Chris and gave personal details as requested. I told him that the FSA telephone number had been obtained from the WDM(via Johann Harri's article in the Independent) He told me that the FSA dealt in stocks and Shares not commodities and that their powers were given to them by the government. When pressed on this issue namely whether or not they would lobby the government to give them the power to regulate food speculation he said I was to contact my local MP, which I will do.
Posted by Geoff Greenwood (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 10:03.FSA
a very pleasant young woman listened to my concerns and responded sympathetically, explaining that the FSA has no remit to regulate the banks regarding food speculation, only commodities. An act of parliament would be needed, and she advised taking this to my MP. I said that I certainly would be, but also requested that the FSA asked parliament about this scandalous area of speculation.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 09:59.FFA call
I rang FSA Tues.am and was answered courteously. I was told that they had had a very large number of calls on this issue and have told Head Office of the 'passionate' concern of many people on this issue.As they do no have the powers to deal with this at present they suggest we contact MPs on the issue too.
Posted by anonymous (not verified) on 20 Jul 2010 at about 09:37.Rice and speculation
Hi @Anna Taylor and @Tim Worstall Thanks for your questions in relation to rice and speculation. As our report 'the great hunger lottery' (http://bit.ly/aSJlFW) explains wheat, maize and rice (the three great food staples) are intricately connected to each other. If someone starts eating less of one of these staples (because the price has increased) it is likely that they will start eating more of one the others. Whilst it is correct that rice isn't speculated on, wheat and maize are. However, if there is a large increase in the price of wheat and maize their will be an increase in demand for the cheaper rice, this will push up the price. If you look at the graph on page 23 of the report you'll see that wheat prices rose significantly followed by maize just before rice. The huge rice spike is the result key exporters implementing rice export bans to protect their populations from rising food prices. Statistical analysis by the FAO and research by the World Bank backs up that the rice price spike was caused by the high wheat prices. Which in turn was caused by speculation
Posted by alex.wood on 19 Jul 2010 at about 17:38.Contact With The FSA
I rang and was answered very quickly by a very polite lady. I received a similar response to most of the other callers below regarding the remit and powers of the FSA and was told that my call would be "logged". When I asked what happened to the logs of the calls, and if and how the substantial amount of calls that might have been logged today would be reflected to Government, I received a rather uncertain response. The lady suggested that I might call back in a couple of days for more details on this.
Posted by Jerry Neville (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 17:19.call to the FSA
The lady who answered my call said the FSA was not in a position to petition the Government for additional regulatory powers. It is a body set up by the government who decides on it's remit. That means its down to us to petition the government through our MP's, etc, to get the FSA the powers it needs to tackle firms engaging in food speculation. Next email goes off to my MP. Derek Robertson
Posted by derek robertson (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 16:58.just phoned
I pressed 3 and got through really quickly to Sam. I just said that I want to log a complaint about Goldman Sachs about their speculation on food commodities driving up prices etc. He immediately referred to a press release and that staff are waiting for a Q&A from head office, that they are waiting for answers at the moment but that I could still log a complaint. Though I would have to log a complaint directly with Goldman Sachs, mentioning that it is an official FSA complaint to ensure it will be picked up when the FSA does an audit. He gave me an email contact for complaints charles.eve@gs.com and recommended to check the FSA website before writing.
Posted by Susanne (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 16:32.Shaping the powers of the new financial regulatory body
Spoke to lady at FSA, who reminded me that they are being wound down as a body, but that there should be an alternative regulatory framework put in place soon. This is therefore a key time to make sure that the new regulatory framework has the power to act on trade justice issues. Is there a good source of information on the Coalition's initial plans on this front? Do we know who are the key people involved? Also, doesn't it make sense to focus on price rises on basic foods such as bread rather than diluting the message by talking about luxuries such as coffee and chocolate? Re the comments left by others above, I'd be interested to read response from the WDM about the suggestion that the biggest swing in food prices was for rice - which was not affected by speculation. Is this correct? Anyway, my main conclusion from the call is that now is a good time to contact MPs about this issue, but perhaps there then needs to be a further action relating to ensuring that the new regulatory body has the necessary powers to play a positive role in bringing about trade justice. All the best Anna
Posted by Anna Taylor (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 16:30.Just rang FSA
I live in Australia now, but like to keep in touch, especially with matters like this of international concern. Thank you WDM! I got straight through, made the suggested comments, and left my e mail address. We have a wonderful organisation here called "Getup", which allows similar activist feedback. Yesterday I rang a cabinet minister's office in Canberra to comment about the need for action on climate change' Keep up the good work!
Posted by Len Hobbs (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 16:15.They really are very nice at the FSA!
I just called as well, got through to a really helpful woman who ran through the entirety of the remit of the FSA (very patiently, bless her!) and then we both bemoaned the fact that they only really have power to help with consumer related issues. It definitely sounded like she'd had a few calls about it already! She advised contacting my local mp about the specific issue, but also to raise the question of why there is effectively no regulator for these international transactions that allow the hunger casino to exist in the first place. Now to write to my MP and get them to bring it up with the DTI, DEFRA and maybe even DFID
Posted by Tom A (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 15:43.FSA conversation
Got through quickly and after saying what I was calling about was asked for lots of contact details, which I gave. Then the standard response that they don't regulate things like this and suggested I contact my MP. I asked if they could put pressure on the Government to expand their powers or if they were going to take any action as result of all the calls. She said not at the moment as this issue has only come to light today. But that they were taking a note of all the details so they had all the info to hand.
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 15:18.Helpful and friendly response
The lady I spoke to said "We can definitely help, but we'll just have to take a few details." Then they asked for my full name, my title, my postal address, my email address and my phone number! I asked what all the info was for and she said they might use it to contact me about my query. Re: food speculation, she said "This is not something that we really regulate" and that they "can't comment" on it because it's in the media at the moment... funny, I thought media coverage should provide extra impetus for the FSA to set out their position on this. She then gave me contact details for the company secretary, who is the person who sets out the rules of what the FSA can and can't regulate (presumably once that power is granted by the government). The contact details are: complaints@fsa.gov.uk 0207 066 9870 She said they've had a lot of calls about food speculation this morning! She seemed clued up and keen to help.
Posted by Kate Griffin (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 15:07.food speculation
As with the others, very polite but said that it was not within their remit to do anything about it
Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 15:02.Food Speculation
I rang FSA & pressed 4. Received an apology for delay because of heavy demand but was in fact put through immediately. The lady I spoke to asked if I was willing to give my contact details, which I was happy to do (including age!) and when I expressed my concern she explained that the FSA had no authority to regulate the banks but that as a voter it was my right to express my concern through my local MP. I asked whether the FSA could put pressure on the Government to act on this matter but she repeated that FSA had no authority and that I could write to my MP. She thanked me for calling and assured me that my call would be logged.
Posted by Brian Ranford (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:59.What a stupid action
This is a ridiculous action, founded on a total failure to understand the regulatory powers of the FSA and the basic functioning of the markets they seek to control. The FSA doesn't even regulate the commodity market. They're basically a bunch of pen-pushers who's main responsibility is to make sure that mortgage salespeople wear the right cufflinks. Even if they did have the power to regulate the commodity markets, then it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference as the trade can move offshore. Further, markets are inherently unstable anyway, due to unpredictable harvests, which is the real problem here. Goldman Sachs don't make commodities more expensive, they just seek to profit from the rising markets. No bank can force people to pay more for bacon by investing in it - as without sales to consumers there would be no market and the products are perishable. In fact, efficient (i.e free) markets reduce costs generally and thus reduce prices for consumers, and increase the proportion of those prices which are available to farmers as opposed to middlemen. The idea that some receptionist at the FSA is suddenly going to start intervening in the global food markets and thus magically end poverty is indeed as stupid as it sounds. Come up with a decent action, for pity's sake.
Posted by Andrew Lockley (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:57.Second attempt
Just got through to the Perimeter Guidance Team at the FSA at the second attempt. They've clearly now got a standard line for responding to queries - didn't manage to write it all down, but lots of stuff about the FSA having a role to 'liaise with the exchanges' to ensure that the owners of derivatives are fully aware of their risk level and that trading is 'clear and fair', but with no FSA role in terms of controlling prices. I asked them to email me the statement, but they can't do that - would have to email them and it would take 12 days to respond!
Posted by Steve Rolfe (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:57.FSA
Very polite (and somewhat long-winded) response that advised they have, at present, no responsibilities to regulate this area; that they don't decide, they are told what areas to regulate. They are working on a formal response to WDM's calls on this subject and hope to have it available shortly.
Posted by Mike Watkins (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:51.Got through after long wait.
Got through after long wait. Sympathetic response from FSA saying they understood our concerns, but said their powers were limited in this respect and advised me to lobby my MP to get law changed so the regulatory body could control such food speculation.
Posted by Dave Cope (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:40.FSA "no power"
The chat I had was perfectly polite with good service from the chap answering my call. In the end the response amounted to "we don't have the power to do anything so please talk to someone else". I asked the FSA to issue statements in response to this and to in particular tell us who we needed to speak to - either to help beef the FSA up to a level where they can address this or to get the issue sorted through another means. I don't think it's acceptable that they say nothing.
Posted by laurence (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:38.What the FSA said to me
The person at the FSA said that the FSA head office was preparing a statement on the issue of speculation on food. He said that they had had a number of calls recently on this issue but that they don't have the regulatory powers to deal with it and only deal with domestic UK problems such as mortgages that have been wrongly sold to people, etc. and that their powers were going to be taken away from them in a year or so. He didn't say that another office was going to be set up which would have these powers however. I asked him who I could contact who had the powers to change this situation regarding speculation on food prices and he said that I should contact my MP and go down the governmental route. I asked him for a name in the government to contact in order to get my point across more effectively. He said that he in his office didn't have such a name for me to contact. I said that I had contacted the Chancellor but hadn't received a reply and that I had contacted my MP but as yet had not received a reply but that it was only a week ago that I had sent an action card via www.WDM.org.uk to her. I said that I would ring back in a few days to get further updates from the FSA.
Posted by Dr David Ward (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:38.Lobby MP
The woman I spoke to was very nice. She suggested that I should lobby my MP to give the FSA more regulatory powers. Apparently they are being phased out in two years and whatever replaces them will have a different structure with banks being separate from the rest. It would be good to have an influence on the remit of the new set-up.
Posted by Rachel Clark (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:28.A quite wonderful report
You spend pages and pages telling us how financial markets and speculation increase price volatility. Then you tell us that rice, where there are no such markets, had a larger price swing than the commodities in which there were financial markets and speculation. People who can both read and think would probably, from that, take away the standard economic idea that speculation reduces price volatility. Pity you've spent 34 pages trying to argue the opposite really.
Posted by Tim Worstall (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 14:22.called FSA used choice 4
Called the FSA at 13:09 and had a very polite helpful reply. Said they were waiting for a statement from the board but they couldn't regulate it at the moment. Asked them to ask the government to allow them to regulate it. Left my email address for them to forward the statement and any other information. Obviously had a lot of calls.
Posted by Mary Gillie (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 13:16.Food speculation
I have just participated in a conference in Swanwick on food held by the National Justice & Peace Network of the Catholic Church. Vandana Shiva, the well-known international activist, criticised the financial speculation in food and its effect of putting prices outside the pockets of the poor. There should be an international law prohibiting speculation in food so as to enable the poor throughout the world to buy their basic nutritional necessities. How can the United nations Declaration of Human Rights to basic nutrition be observed if financial speculators gamble on food just to make personal profit?
Posted by Edward Egan (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 13:10.Spoke to Charlotte FSA re Food Speculation
I informed her of food speculation concerns and need for regulation re this and requested she pass this on to her manager etc. She said this matter would best be addressed to FSA Company Secretariat Tel: 02070669870
Posted by Henry Adams (not verified) on 19 Jul 2010 at about 12:56.Post new comment