Share this page

Bookmark and Share

blog

Blog

Syndicate content

Miriam Ross, media officer

The news that the Indian government might choose to buy French fighter jets instead of British Typhoon jets should have nothing to do with the UK’s development aid. But thanks to comments from development minister Andrew Mitchell, aid has become entangled in the media story about the arms trade.

Really? So is it OK, Mr Mitchell, to use aid as a tool to help sell weapons?

No, it’s not OK, and it’s also illegal. The World Development Movement’s exposé of the Pergau dam affair back in 1994 prompted a judicial review that made this emphatically clear.

The UK government had planned to spend £234 million of aid money on the Pergau Dam project in Malaysia, as a sweetener to encourage the Malaysian government to buy arms from British companies. The World Development Movement took the government to court and won, and this landmark case made it clear that UK law does not allow aid to be used as a political tool.

The law hasn’t changed, and the only legal purpose of aid is still to alleviate poverty and promote the...

James Angel, campaigns and policy intern

Remember 2008? After decades of unchecked greed and corruption, the neoliberal house of cards finally toppled over, leaving us with the worst economic crisis since the great depression. The big banks have been gambling with our money for years but, as we all know, the costs of the crisis – the unemployment, the lost homes, the austerity measures – have been borne by us. 

Since the crisis, public bail-outs to the tune of several hundred billion pounds have quickly secured a return to record profits and bonuses for the guilty banks. At the same time, their destructive activities have only increased. As has been exposed by the World Development Movement, since the 2008 housing crash banks like Goldman Sachs and Barclays have turned to betting on food as a new means of extracting profit. Financial speculation on food commodities markets has pushed up food prices, leaving the world’s poorest people unable to afford to eat.

In its starkest moment of crisis yet, neoliberalism’s true colours have been made plain for all to see: whilst the banks are ‘too big to fail’, people’s lives can slip by the wayside....

Pontus Westerberg, web officer

Last year's winner of the 'cartoon of the year' award was 21 year old University of Westminister undergraduate Ben Jennings. Beating household names like Steve Bell and Martin Ronson, he received the prestigeous prize for his '£1,000,000 treasure hunt' cartoon depicting the war in Libya. 

Ben Jennings has been drawing cartoons for as long as he can remember; in his Maths class at school he'd be drawing scathing caricatures of his teacher instead of Venn diagrams and at 15 he began selling his drawing. He has now produced cartoons for The Guardian, The i newspaper, The Morning Star, The Huffington Post and The Stool Pigeon music newspaper, among others, as well as taking part in various exhibitions and producing two animated music videos for MOBO-award winning rapper Akala, used on the rapper's website.

I'm very pleased to announce that during 2012 Ben will be drawing regular cartoons for WDM!

Here is the first one, relating to Barclays winning the Public Eye 'shame' Award for its role in food speculation. ...

Amy Horton, Food campaigner

Soon after it got light on Saturday morning, I set off from a tiny chalet, lugging my bags through a blizzard down a snowy track impassable to cars. The bags were heavier than when I’d arrived, because I was carrying an award. The previous day, Barclays – the UK’s biggest food speculator – had declined to show up to the Public Eye Awards to collect its prize for being the world’s worst corporation. Following WDM’s nomination, Barclays was selected by a jury, while the ‘winner’ of a second prize decided by over 90,000 voters was mining giant Vale.

Last year, WDM revealed that Barclays makes up to £340 million a year from betting on food prices. Our groups across the country helped to bring home to people in the UK what rising food prices mean in the global south, holding sales of impossibly expensive food outside their local branches of Barclays.

But Barclays continues to speculate on food and maintains a close relationship with UK Treasury ministers who are seeking to scupper EU...

Pontus Westerberg, web officer

Yesterday David Cameron took the stage in Davos yesterday to push his outdated agenda of deregulation, liberalisation and slashing of workers right as the solution to the world’s problems, to the applause of the gathered representatives of the world’s 1 per cent. Meanwhile, the Transnational Institute published a set of infographics that tell a completely different story. 

They show extreme wealth and income disparities with 0.001% of the world’s population, or just 10.9 million individuals, controlling two-thirds of the worlds GDP, while 2.5 billion people survive on less than $2 a day. The wealth they control, $47.2 trillion, could pay for climate change adaptation costs for the next 190 years or clean water for the world’s people for the next 1,423 years. 

They show the close ties between the corporate and political elites, with the architects of neoliberal globalisation like Alan Greenspan, Tony Blair, Dick Cheney and Larry Summers sitting on the boards of giant corporations such as JP Morgan, Deutshe Bank and Haliburton. And they show that tax evasion costs 145 countries $3.1 trillion annually, enough to fund full immunisations for...

Kirsty Wright, climate campaigner

The Durban UN climate talks saw a repetition of the pattern of injustice and inaction of previous climate talks, with rich countries protecting their own interests and those of multinational industries over those of people.

The Durban climate talks were my third experience of what has increasingly become a farcical annual event in the arena of international politics. Throughout two humid, wretched weeks, rich industrialised countries dedicated themselves to protecting economic elites and polluting industries over the survival of people and the planet.  Each year, I have seen bullying and bribery tactics become more ingrained into the process, and the drive to ensure the forum becomes a space where the interests of corporations are ranked higher than the well being of humanity becoming ever stronger, as rich countries desperately struggle to protect the status quo by avoiding the key question: how are global emission cuts to be reached?

Kirsty stands with a placard which reads 'GCF Greedy Corporate Fund'...

Liz Murray, head of Scottish campaigns

Alex Salmond has called for 2012 to be the "year of climate justice", but Scottish Ministers are already going against that by not funding their own plans and policies to cut climate emissions in Scotland.

Just last week, Scotland’s First Minister Alex Salmond was at the World Energy Forum in Abu Dhabi urging world leaders to make 2012 the "year of climate justice". He rightly made the link between economic development, energy choices and climate justice, saying: “It is vitally important that, as the world moves towards economic recovery in 2012, we place climate justice at the very heart of the decisions we make on energy policy and economic and social development in the coming months.” He also lauded his nation’s world leading climate change legislation which has set a target of reducing Scotland’s climate change emissions by 42 per cent by 2020 and 80 per cent by 2050.

What timing, then, to be out there on the world stage saying all this just a few days before the publication of the Scottish budget bill, which shows that the Scottish government is not going to fund the policies that would allow it to reach the targets it set in the world leading climate change act of which Alex...

Liz Murray, head of Scottish campaigns 

It’s heartening to hear that President Obama has stood up to Big Oil by rejecting the permit for the Keystone XL tar sands oil pipeline sought by Canadian oil firm TransCanada. The reason given was that the project is not in the national interest. The pipeline was planned to carry tar sands oil more than 2,000 miles from Alberta in Canada to the oil refineries and ports in Texas. A huge campaign from indigenous activists, environmentalists, farmers, ranchers and youth climate activists was run against the project, and American citizens submitted more than 250,000 public comments against the proposal. 

This is good news. While it is still possible for TransCanada to reapply for the permit to build the pipeline, it must surely be a major blow to the tars sands industry in Canada, which needs to be able to get the oil out of Canada if it is to be economically viable.  

But the tar sands industry has to be stopped. Tar sands are one of the most polluting sources of fossil fuel, threatening water supplies and land locally when it is extracted and threatening the climate when it is burned. 

We’re linked here in...

Innocent Sithole, Web intern

Join our mailing list

Get all the latest campaign actions, events and news direct to your inbox.

Subscribe via RSS


Readers who have tweeted about this

Get all the latest campaign actions, events and news direct to your inbox.

Donate